![]() ![]() The same holds true for Joomla, Drupal and WordPress. Apples and oranges are both fruit, but it's hard to quantify one feature or another that makes either better. A new wave of free sites encourages fast blogging, multimedia entries and social networking: Microblogger shootout: Posterous Spaces vs.We compare the two best-known free blogging services to find out which is better - and for whom: Blogging service shootout: Blogger vs.But after re-examining the WordPress ecosystem and tools, I decided to include WordPress in this shootout of the Big Three open source CMS platforms.įor more reviews of applications for building blogs and websites, check out these articles: Past experience indicated that WordPress, while gaining complexity and flexibility, was still not quite up to speed with Drupal and Joomla. Initially, my inclination was not to include WordPress in this review. (, along with Blogger, Tumblr and Posterous, will be reviewed in an upcoming roundup.) The other, the open-source WordPress CMS software, is the technology I will examine in this article. is a free service (not unlike, say, Blogger) that allows anyone to create blogs using pre-built themes and tools. WordPress actually has two implementations, which can confuse newcomers to the software. Like Joomla, WordPress also began as a forked project in 2003, gracefully leaving b2, its parent project. ![]() A few months of arguments over the exact nature of Miro's interpretation of free software principles eventually led to the split of what would become Joomla from Mambo and the beginning of a vibrant community-based CMS. The trouble between the projects began in early 2005, when Miro established a non-profit Mambo Foundation (good) that pretty much kept all control of Mambo in the hands of Miro (not so good). Of the three, Joomla is the newcomer to the CMS scene, first released in 2005 as a fork from the earlier Mambo CMS, which was owned by vendor Miro International. In fact, any Web app feature you might think of should be available with Drupal or Joomla add-ons. Built by developer Dries Buytaert, the project was open-sourced in 2001 and eventually gained a following of community members that has made Drupal one of the most successful open-source projects to date, with a large ecosystem of add-ons and commercial vendors.īoth Drupal and Joomla are designed to enable users to build websites with template-based management, and both let users plug in add-ons that provide highly dynamic features, such as e-commerce, blogging with comments or mapping. Drupal had comparatively sedate beginnings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |